InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 52
Posts 9842
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/14/2007

Re: FINISHLINE post# 32944

Thursday, 06/22/2017 11:28:48 AM

Thursday, June 22, 2017 11:28:48 AM

Post# of 34405
I think we can always sue as long as we don't wait beyond any statue of limitations. To use a metaphor, I think Stan and Gill are in a hole and they keep digging. (edited) I've previously outlined some of the stuff, I think they have done. I think they might be doing other things with the buyout, but, I can't prove anything until the buyout occurs.

I think a good case can be made against them, but, they might not be through and could be doing things that would make a stronger case. I think POW! would be better off, if Stan and Gill not hampered the company by their actions.

If, POW! were getting the revenue generated by Stan's photo opportunity business, POW! could have been showing a profit for years. If, Stan, Gill, and Art had allowed Barth and Sandman to sell their shares, POW! would have had an additional $1.6 million (?), from them paying off on the subscription.

But, getting "fair value" for our shares may be a matter of exercising "dissenter rights", especially if the company can be valued on the value of it's assets.

end of part 2.



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.