InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Windrider

09/10/06 1:56 PM

#41062 RE: Peeb #41061

Ummm why not inform shareholders? We cant?
icon url

pokestake

09/10/06 2:15 PM

#41063 RE: Peeb #41061

Peeb2005..this also seems reasonable. Maybe in this scenario Edwards would be allowed to commence other operations so long as Kennedy weather could be relied upon to remain stable for some duration of time that would allow time for suspension of Edwards operations if an emergency developed and Kennedy weather was forcasted to deteriorate. In other words, once in orbit there is time to evaluate other options that could work around activities at Edwards. Of course, come landing time, then all bets are off. This then becomes a function of the duration and flexibility of the strat testing regimen as to whether they must wait until the end of the mission. However, apparently it was determined that if strat testing started the last week of August, than there would have been time and logistics to conduct tests while the shuttle was in orbit.
icon url

3531niapoc

09/10/06 2:16 PM

#41064 RE: Peeb #41061

So today the new excuse for not having a test flight is because of the shuttle?
The stories you guys are coming up with are beyond belief. If it was the case, this is one thing that Huff and co would be more than happy to brag about.
The real excuse is unknown simply because Globetel has decided not to tell anyone why it's not happening.
For the sake of the people that come here to read infos about the company, how about we try to be more realistic. I will try to do the same on my end.
icon url

nerd86

09/11/06 11:04 AM

#41145 RE: Peeb #41061

peeb the Shuttle is docked at the Space Station. The only possible EAFB involved emergencies would be during launch and recovery. And I doubt they believe they will be able to vector the Shuttle into a particular runway. I beleive they would keep them all available after launch and during recovery.