Huh? What are you talking about? You got it completely wrong. R & G has a lot of skin in these cases by taking them on contingency, meaning they are very confident about the outcome of the cases. And of course they are NOT working pro bono in these cases. You did not like the part "SFOR flat out can't afford them"? That's the very true financial situation SFOR is in currently. Also that is another crucial clue (besides believing in SFOR's patent) in their involvement w/SFOR despite the fact that SFOR can't afford them and yet they did take the cases and representing a penny stock company. Need I say more?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
