Replies to post #31348 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[Goodbuddy4863]

Yes, You are indeed correct Wolf.

I seen the same thing a few Years ago[little over 2 yrs ago I believe].

That was one Hell of a decision.

But, that was a different IPR story about some other type of Infringement.

Go:

$$$$ UOIP $$$$

[GS1]

CISCO has no chance of winning this case and it is obvious after reading court documents and they will be paying heavy price for it and it will affect their balance sheet and shareholder annual dividend as well. This could easily be multibillion dollars but they can restructure it in such a way that they don't have to pay all at once. It could be paid over the years just to save face. This is not even close they can't prove anything in court that is bottom line. Period.

[KeepItRealistic]

Not the case with this patent.

This patent is ROCK SOLID & has the cable companies & Cisco by the ball$

Pacer update after 12th will provide more clues to how close we are to settlement.

[penny_hunter_]

So you are saying CISCO has no other options other than just finding typos on Chanbond's patent documents. From their petitions, they tried to invalidate Chanbond's patent but judges denied their claims, no proof that supported CISCO's claims. Let's see if they can prove "skillful artisan".