InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

nidan7500

06/11/17 11:31 AM

#108062 RE: falconer66a #108059

Thanks falcon.

I would also point out that we all understand if someone REALLY wanted to lie, make up research facts, present a false solution based on obtuse facts that they claim but which are truly FAKE, then they will. We all run a sort of micro mini risk assessment app when we see these things every day. No big deal. You either believe or you do not depending on your biases. Always try to keep an open mind.

If Dr. M was a complete liar then people like Adam F would be heros. The world is full of people who see absolutely nothing wrong with stealing. In fact most of the worlds population would kill the average American for his belt buckle.

Unless and until a scientific argument is made and facts are presented which contradict his A2-73 Homeostasis story I will remain a believer. The key word is contradicting.
icon url

blue finch

06/11/17 11:38 AM

#108063 RE: falconer66a #108059

Thanks 66a
Another excellent rebuttal


We all wait
icon url

OFP

06/11/17 11:56 AM

#108064 RE: falconer66a #108059

You are welcome to believe that Anavex made up its story of how Anavex 2-73 re-connects mitochondria and endoplasmic reticula.

This mispresents what I said. Then you go on to use "eminence"-based science arguments to try to support bolster points against the misrepresentation not against what I actually said leading to a multilayered mess of a "rebuttal". Despite this at least 2 people have already done some cheerleading of the response.

If you can come up with any substantial arguments as to where its shown that 2-73 has a MOA that is not simply the generic S1R effect please respond. Otherwise I suggest we end this "debate" for the time being.