"It is my belief that if a stay were to be granted, in light of the defendants exponential growth, which would be expected to continue in the 17 month stay, such a stay would be devistating to SFOR as it would foreclose many more opportunities SFOR would otherwise have to sell it's patented Protect ID OOBA product. I firmly believe the long-term viability of SFOR would be in doubt if a stay were to be granted."
Now from their FINS
So, again.
Their Financials say money is an issue, Mr. Waller states the company could not survive with a 17 month stay. FACTS!