InvestorsHub Logo

WBCTrader

06/08/17 10:58 AM

#168332 RE: Gold49er #168329

YAWN, ONCE AGAIN

Fins, and now letter to Judge by Mr. Waller

"It is my belief that if a stay were to be granted, in light of the defendants exponential growth, which would be expected to continue in the 17 month stay, such a stay would be devistating to SFOR as it would foreclose many more opportunities SFOR would otherwise have to sell it's patented Protect ID OOBA product. I firmly believe the long-term viability of SFOR would be in doubt if a stay were to be granted."

Now from their FINS


At March 31, 2017, we had cash on hand in the amount of $362,587. Management estimates that the current funds on hand will be sufficient to continue operations through the next three months. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional funds and implement our business plan. Management is currently seeking additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt and equity securities for cash to operate our business.




So, again.

Their Financials say money is an issue, Mr. Waller states the company could not survive with a 17 month stay. FACTS!