InvestorsHub Logo

otterman

05/25/17 1:30 PM

#141355 RE: I-Glow #141341

"company that states they are going to stop filing to stop the toxic"

And just when did they "state" that? No company would put out such a ridiculous notion.

space1230

05/25/17 6:32 PM

#141376 RE: I-Glow #141341

But look at the last time that DBMM actually made a filing. They filed NT's every quarter as if that was acceptable. Why not just file a 15-12g and terminate SEC filing obligations? Did they think that they were going to be able to file extensions indefinitely? It's unbelievable that it went on for as long as it did. But according to the suspension order, the SEC attempted to contact DBMM in February and they got ignored. I mean, really DBMM? They didn't care. They knew that Asher was going to win the judgement and get awarded a worthless grey sheet shell (after the SEC stepped in, because it was evident after the court order took place).


the SEC will revoke the ticker and shareholders will lose their entire investment.

If you are ever investing in a company that states they are going to stop filing to stop the toxic notes from being converted - don't walk but run away.