InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

cashstrapped

05/24/17 8:55 AM

#165739 RE: Jtech #165737

Agree. It's partly to negotiate what the parties can see, as opposed to attorneys and experts. This case will be over by Christmas. After all, it is the Rocket Docket! My one post for the day. Go SFOR.
icon url

ZPaul

05/24/17 9:28 AM

#165754 RE: Jtech #165737

From Verizon's tenth (2017 ) annual breach report

In addition, half of all breaches involved stolen or easily-guessable passwords.

Many of these could have been prevented with basic security hygiene.

"We get upset that we still have so many lost and stolen devices as data breaches," he said. "In 2017, it's not bleeding edge technology to encrypt mobile devices. It would save a lot of headaches if they could encrypt those devices -- they wouldn't have to report it, just have the loss of the cost of the asset."

Similarly, two-factor authentication could have stopped many of the attacks based on using leaked passwords or passwords recorded by keystroke loggers.

icon url

4sleddogs

05/24/17 11:31 AM

#165807 RE: Jtech #165737

O.K. so the protective order is just to safeguard other documents of both SFOR and the defendants not needed for discovery. Thanks for that explanation as to the protective order impact.