Replies to post #165478 on Zerify Inc (ZRFY)

[jpike]

Decision limited to "where" to file....not weather there was infringement.

[DR. EVIL]

Individuals and companies that generate revenue by suing over patents instead of making products have been dubbed "patent trolls."

Thank god we aren't patent trolls!!

BAWHAHAHA

[baldeagle1]

Certainly not relative to SFOR's pending/ongoing patent litigation. Ropes & Gray have more than validated SFOR's legal strength/patent strength in pursuit of the patent infringement cases initiated/to be initiated on behalf of SFOR.

SFOR's patent(s) are like holding a stockpile of gold bars, waiting to convert them into hard cash and distribute it to their shareholders!

WE KNOW WHAT WE HOLD!!!

SFOR STRONG!!! GO SFOR!!!

[baldeagle1]

SFOR'S pattern of waking up around lunch, or shortly thereafter will hopefully bring some buying power back and head us towards a green close today!

GO SFOR!!!

[fourthjohn]

good thing that Blank and Rome and Ropes and Gray have offices everywhere.

[4sleddogs]

That's O.K., SFOR does not meet the classic definition of patent trolls which have no products to sell and survive solely on litigation.

[B RY]

"The decision overturned a ruling last year by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, a Washington-based patent court, that said patent suits are fair game anywhere a defendant company's products are sold."
The defendants were trying to take it to the calfornia courts in SFOR case. Btw, Strikeforce has a full product line, hence no patent troll arguement is valid in SFOR senario. Thanks Moeclay for posting this. Made my day Moe better. ;&)