InvestorsHub Logo
Replies to #17710 on Cycle Trading

paulgmx1

05/21/17 2:14 PM

#17711 RE: CITYHAWK #17710

I do.works fine

spdpro

05/21/17 5:25 PM

#17712 RE: CITYHAWK #17710

yep, still have it "not paid upgrade" but thinking about it

I also run this > https://adblock-pro.en.softonic.com/
https://adblock-pro.en.softonic.com/#app-softonic-review

JLS

05/25/17 1:26 PM

#17719 RE: CITYHAWK #17710

Haven't tried it.

Might try it on Chrome but not on Firefox. That's because I get lightning fast downloads of iHub, or any other site, using Firefox with NoScript (which blocks just about anything you want). But sometimes, NoScript might leave a little trash on the screen (such as a box of text instead of a video or ad containing script).

When using Chrome, I use Adblock_Plus. It is very much like Adblock_Pro, so you would have to read someone's comparative review to know the differences and whether or not the differences are material in your situation. My opinion is that some version of Adblock is a necessity on Chrome (and it sure speeds up iHub).

If I want the most efficient (safest and speediest) browsing, then I use Firefox with NoScript -- there is no NoScript for Chrome. With that combination, both browsing safety and efficiency (reduced download of useless ads, etc.) is better than anything I've experienced with Chrome. (I use NetWorx to monitor live data in/out, both duration and amount.)

But there is a ScriptSafe for chrome. I haven't tried it, but I probably will. It's relatively new, and reviews of it say that it is not as good as NoScript on Firefox (yet). It's available at the Chrome web store, and has a rating of 4-stars with 1,406 reviews.

Comparative studies (without NoScript): http://tinyurl.com/l9nhmmd