Replies to post #10846 on RVUE Holdings Inc. (fka RVUE)

[Advice_Needed]

Yes...let's be logical.

It would only make sense for someone losing money hand over fist to just let this thing go dark and walk away from it forever. But roche is not...he is paying his loans back to himself and making this thing current with zero debt. Obviously he has a plan for it and that alone makes it a GREAT play.

I keep seeing BS about legal ramifications. Sorry kids...welcome to the otc. If roche did do something here to screw what was left of shareholders...nothing would happen. Just like nothing happens to the 10's of thousands of other plays on the otc that screw shareholders over every single day...except weekends and holidays.

Finally, roche would never do that based on his character? Ummmm...who here knows roche on a personal level with his cell number on your phone? Nobody! This guy is a businessman and he didn't get ahead by losing money.

I think his actions of making this debt free and current show he has great plans for it. That combined with a low O/S...which is mostly owned by roche...makes this a risk worth taking. We may even find out this coming week being the auction will take place "on or around May 31st."

GLTA!

[Illumin8edSurfer]

I like this logic. My only question and concern is keeping vigilance on his shares. Are we certain that while RVUE is in dark status the information on his share count is accurate? Could he no longer be holding what the community believes he is holding, in dark status the reporting rules change, all I am asking is if it is possible? For those that are proficient in dark status logic.