Replies to post #34573 on Eline Entertainment Group Inc (EEGI)

[Amievil]

Your drunk driver analogy is quite a stretch.


Nice try though.


As for the blame, being suckered in falls on the investor ALWAYS and is even worse when they stick around.


I didn't get played. As I stated twice I made 700% then left my original to play with. I'm not the one blaming the company you are.

And its obvious that most pinks are garbage. Going in knowing or not is on the investor ALWAYS.

So yes the fault is on the investor.

ALWAYS!

Unless of course there was a gun to their head when they clicked on 'confirm'. I'm guessing not.


Weren't you ever taught to take responsibility for your actions when you were young or is it now that you are an adult you throw that 'nonsense' out the window.


Unreal.



I'm tall enuf don't need your soap box.

[Amievil]

See post 34582.

[jvgcredit]

Of course the TA knew that stock had been issued to Barton. Who do you think issues the stock? I don't think you understand the definition of unregistered. The stock issued to Barton and his cronies was unregistered because it was issued pursuant to an exemption to registration rather than pursuant to a registration statement. This exemption was invalid, hence Barton and company's little run in with the SEC. The filings showed all of the convertible debt so any shareholder could have figured out that massive dilution was going to occur 12 months after these notes.