InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mapman1010

05/19/17 6:28 PM

#105664 RE: NWDR #105661

Hi NWDR. very nice explanation of your reasons of confidence. i notice the same experiences with my mom's mild to moderate dementia.. she seems more lost when she complains of not sleeping well.
i have the same confidence in Dr Missling. My first purchase was @.39 and now have a very overweight position in AVXL and i have been accumulating weekly since the hard fought patent battle was apparently resolved in our favor.
Well wishes for you,
Map
icon url

falconer66a

05/19/17 8:57 PM

#105674 RE: NWDR #105661

Safety and Insomnia Factors. Another Anavex 2-73 market?

The profound efficacy of Anavex 2-73 to effectively allow people with insomnia to resume normal sleep is, of yet, not properly factored into future AVXl values.

Two matters of demonstrated value:

A, Anavex 2-73 has proven to cause no disqualifying adverse events. Unlike almost all neuro-active drugs, it has no record of disqualifying side effects, as proven in the P1/P2 Australian clinical data. The stuff is utterly safe.

B, In that same clinical trial, it demonstrated universal, complete treatment of insomnia.

What, then, if Anavex 2-73 were to be proposed as a new prescription insomniac? Insomnia is a major public health issue, causing all sorts of untoward outcomes, at great cost. The market for a safe, effective treatment for this mental health scourge is gigantic.

Were that to occur, were it to come to market as an insomniac, might it be subsequently discovered that those treating their insomnia with the Anavex drug subsequently had reduced rates of CNS disease onset? (Incidental CNS disease prophylaxis?)
icon url

Fireman02360

05/19/17 9:09 PM

#105676 RE: NWDR #105661

NWDR...EXCELLENT POST!
icon url

plexrec

05/19/17 10:49 PM

#105683 RE: NWDR #105661

NWDR...great response and I wholeheartedly agree !!!! Great co we have here---great things will happen here !!! Long Avxl !!
icon url

Amatuer17

05/20/17 6:00 AM

#105691 RE: NWDR #105661

I still hold stock here but very skeptical - many points in SA and comments are true.

- too much enthusiasm on results of only 25 patients
- results inconsistent and non-conclusive
- the inordinate delay in 15 month results - is the co not disclosing the results as they are not good and stock will tank? (Reminds me of NTRP)

High reward but higher risk - one can avoid early investment and wait for some more concrete event- if the drug is effective - one can enter later but the initial bump will be missed but on positive side - it will avoid 60% capital erosion like happened in 2016 after the conf (or like NTRP)