InvestorsHub Logo

TopFemaleExec-2014

05/19/17 12:09 PM

#7094 RE: grantastic #7091

Pal, I built our codec. Cornerstone Group Ltd Codec. It is the codec that my CEO Alpesh B. Patel and I April 2010 shared in the $5B M & A with Google's senior management.

My Codec. I don't know which one you were referring in your commentary, but I answered about THE CODEC AT THE TRIAL.

THE ONLY CODEC IN THIS CASE OF MAX SOUND RECKLESSLY AND CRUELLY STEALING OUR VEDANTI IDENTITY, SUING GOOGLE, NETLIX WITHOUT THE RIGHT OR MY KNOWLEDGE.

Why did he sneak his lawsuits with me as co-plaintiff? And in Germany with my own lawyers, pretending that I had approved, emails state from those lawyers copies from Greg: 'don't mention the US lawyers to Connie, it upsets her.' I don't even know Max Sound is suing Google with German patent, my Ireland patent for YouTube and my Luxembourg -all 2012 October grants -I don't know they are suing what? Patent Infringement. So frigging disallowed; there was no doubt as to why I would not sign nor allow Patent Infringement. My agreement was for Adam Levitt and Chris Joe to sue Google for Post Its Notes with Trade Secrets, I/0 Conference of 2013 from YouTube to 'their partners they state: Adsense."

Why Trade Secrets only? Why no Vedanti? Only newly formed June 2014 VSL Communications Ltd --not even fully formed, no stock allocated, no officers--but formed for JV purpose to co-sue with Adam & Chris and Max Sound. Greg's partner Mike Spatz is best friends in Chicago with Adam Levitt: that is how he got into this deal: Greg brought to me the top lawyer in litigation in the United States: but I only capitulated to VSL Communications Ltd suing for TRADE SECRETS WITH THE POST ITS NOTES ON EACH PAGE OF THE COMPLAINT. Why? Because Google might have settled due to media all over the Post Its Notes: "go round patent file our own", (they did 46 within 2011-2014 June research); "try to destroy all email". Not ours but their unlawful mail to outsiders not under NDA.

It took Greg and his men (which one would she like, how can we get her to the table, she seems to trust Paul Myers, she gets on great with Michael Spatz) it took Greg days and days and weeks, six weeks actually to write a May 15 2014 Capitulation email with a Representation Contract attached: "okay you're trying to swim backwards across the Atlantic'...here, No Patent litigation, No License Contract, No Vedanti, I will be your field general, VSL Communications will have 66 2/3, Max Sound will have 33 1/3, but I will have to reduce your (negotiated) $3 Million cash payment upfront, to $1.5 Million with $500,000 for Due Diligence and lawyers review of documents, source code, original Margin Notes; they belong to VSL Communication Ltd (he still has them refusing to return). $3MM Cash becomes $1.5M (never paid, just the due diligence heist), 30 Million shares of Max Sound stock is to be reduced to 10 Million shares (I never sold them, he stole them and the 7.9M too, because I refused to sign over Vedanti, refused to allow Patent Infringement,and I I tried to get Delaware's Patent Infringement sneak attack Dismissed August 2014. I refused to allow secret filing in San Jose, when I saw it you can't imagine my stomach flipping:

why? Google will kill my work I started and risked it all June 2001, filed patent by tier one costly firm worth it though, it was a brilliant patent January 16, 2002; I risked it all, building offices and hiring and paying and paying and trusting in my owb leadership.

As for Greg and a house-sitter part-time new neighbor Hamid Rowshan suing me right now and since Christmas, this Hamid and Greg Halpern with Blaisure signing the secret,stealth FINDER'S FEE AGREEMENT, and between Max Sound and Rowshan Hamid and his 'contact' Korin Daly, a close friend of Halpern< they didn't even know the IDENTITY OR THE NAME OF THE S0-CALLED QUARRY: us in Laguna Beach and London, they didn't know. But signed a Finder's Fee. I am being sued for that Finder's Fee agreement now. And why? Who the hell knows. But Greg helps Korin,and Korin helps Rowshan v Vedanti, VSL Communications v Constance Nash --and I had to hire a lawyer for this b.s mish-mash.

And lose my company 2014, and lose the Tent Pole United States hard won Examination into a Grant July 5, 2011. Now we have Germany. I always said I didn't trust that one.

So Grantastic, I was adamant against Greg's efforts for a penny stock company to buy us, we weren't on that market. Greg (your guy so you should praise him for his determination) starting spewing out M & A contracts April 2014, on an on and on. I said: "no", I will not allow an IPR. No.

May 30, 2014 I stood in his kitchen, thinking I had signed May 16 2014 Representation Agreement: strictly MARGIN NOTES AND TRADE SECRETS. Even that took Greg a lot of time to get me to that table. It took Paul Myers calling me,I had walked and was happy walking, I didn't trust things even though I liked all of the guys in Max Sound: all of them, Paul Myers called and said, "you can trust Greg I've never seen him cheat anybody, I sit next to him all day. Take my word for it Connie, you can trust him."

So May 30, 25 or more people are at Greg's, lawyers from Chicago and Dallas too, are staying at his house. I'm speaking with Chris Joe of Beuther Joe & Carpenter: I LIKED CHRIS. He says, "we're so excited to be your lawyers for the patent infringement case." -

"no, you can't have the right to patents, you can't sue Google or anybody with my patent, it will cause Re-Examination which will stop my Vedanti sale to Ellison or Murdoch or Carlos Slim, Ronson and the guys are into those companies now.

"but worse Chris, you'll cause the loss of the Patent, it will go into the deep freeze 3 or 4 or 5 years, then into Appeal. No. You can't. I'll lose the company. We can't monetize without our patent." That was before they did it. And without representation of us the owners. And without our knowledge. And that was before Greg used my lawyers in Germany: I had set up Trade Secrets & Post Its for quick settlement with Google, a Trade Secrets case which if the Post Its Notes were not used, it would turn into a blood bath -and by the way: Lawyers who did not represent us or the patents or the corporation, nor did they take a phone call, those lawyers ALSO DID NOT USE THE POST ITS NOTES ! Thus, my plan for
EU was as a secondary action: 1 Trade secrets & Notes of culpability in San Jose or Delaware, hq of Google + German court --weeks later -for Patent Infringement: a double whammy. That did not happen.

My codec is not returned. My Source Code is not returned. And VLL contract explictly prohibits Vedanti Systems owning it. I had licensed my codings. And to a big organization elsewhere too.

Constance Nash

Urbanlegend

05/19/17 1:57 PM

#7099 RE: grantastic #7091

All fair and insightful comment it seems to me. But she does have a point about the patent infringement claim being ill advised as it was bound to provoke IPR and nullity proceedings, and eons of litigation. Hard to understand the thinking there -- other than perhaps that the quixotic promise of billions made a good story to tell in a stock promotion.