Replies to post #7082 on Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[Urbanlegend]

The EA case involves Engineering Architecture (not Electronic Arts). The IPR has no bearing on this or vice versa. There is a constant effort to conflate the claims but they are unrelated. The action is going to be set for trial, it appears.

The EU action is a nullify proceeding -- like the IPR, Google seeks to have the Vedanti European patents nullified. It could go better than the PTAB IPR did today, but it probably won't.

The PTAB decision today could be appealed, in which case it would go to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington. That is the same court that dismissed MaxD case on patent infringement for lack of standing.

[TopFemaleExec-2014]

Attia's is Trade Secrets in the United States against Google.

No patents. He had no patents.

No bearing in Europe for the Attia's Trade Secrets case against Google and Flux Factory for stealing Architect Eli Attia's inventions.

He had an abandoned patent. And that is all he thought he had. Inventions in an abandoned patent. Amazingly when he was a guest our home, (others know this story on iHub) I wrote Google's name into Thompson, and Eli Attia name into same search: I found dozens of patents that neither Attia,Greg or Beuther Joe, nobody knew about.

If lawyers would file asap IPR against all of those patents, Attia would be a nuclear power. He isn't getting paid from Google so why make them richer? Google won't be able to monetize the manufacturers or build anything without PATENT; PATENT IS FOR INDEMNIFICATION, FOR ENFORCING, FOR DEFENDING, FOR MANUFACTURING, VENDORS DON'T WANT TO BE SUED, THEY REQUIRE LEGAL INDEMNIFICATION FROM A PATENT. NO PATENT? NO TICKEE, NO LAUNDRY.


File IPR. See who blinks. Can't do it after Google wins another case!


Constance Nash