Replies to post #162057 on Zerify Inc (ZRFY)

[Jtech]

So other companies can but SFOR can't do it?

The other ticker BVT* partnered with a SEWP contractor, I3

and Alvarez IT has SEWP contracts also
https://www.alvarezit.com/contracts/sewp-v
https://www.alvarezit.com/what-we-do/strikeforce

[Eonofelix]

From what I see on a demonstration of the PATENT used by ACS (Advanced CyberSecurity) on a YouTube demonstration done by none other than George Waller of StrikeForce Technologies, ACS is using the PATENT, not the specific product of StrikeForce. Patent use = Licensing

Patent use not Product use = No need for StrikeForce to have any DoD ties.

ACS with DoD = more licensing of StrikeForce patents = more $ to StrikeForce as REVENUE = :-) for SFOR stock holders!

Go ACS therefore... Go $SFOR

[heartbreakhitman]

WBC, it would NOT be SFOR's product the DOD would be using. It is the same exact product except it will say ACS on the box and not SFOR. It's a form of rebranding. that's how channel partners work. ACS gets paid and then in turn ACS will pay SFOR a percentage. I'm saying SFOR does or doesn't have a connection with the DOD through ACS, all I am saying is it is 100% possible.

[4sleddogs]

In the ACS briefing CJ clearly states "We own this patent" (when fully paid for) "and have access to these others" All the patents are SFOR's. He is talking about IP which means licensing fees.