You're the one who said that the company lied about the restricted, and now you are admitting that OTCmarkets only reports what they have been given.
What you are claiming - either deliberately or not is that the company has intentionally lied by saying that the restricted info is 'Unavailable'.
How do you know what RJDG said or didn't say to OTCmarkets? How do you know they said "We don't know what the restricted shares are. They are unavailable to us.". That's how you have presented your argument, yet it is more likely that RJDG simply didn't provide the breakdown to OTCmarkets and THAT'S the reason that OTCmarkets reflects it as 'unavailable' they simply don't have that data.
Misleading. As of course was this post from you that originally got my attention:
<<Just read the company's own PR where they claimed the restricted and unrestricted #s were unavailable.>>
I called you out on this. It isn't in any PR.
<<talk to any TA you wish. they are on top of the restricted and unrestricted at all times ... unless the company itself is hiding something.>>
Not providing the info doesn't imply that the company is hiding something.
My investigation into your claims is over. I found nothing to negatively implicate RJDG. The usual cautions exist until they become fully reporting. I find your claims and emphasis re RJDG to be highly distorted and misleading.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
