You forgot again that Keogh's patents in dispute were completely, utterly, absolutely, conclusively, effectively, finally, thoroughly,
wholly, fully and hook line and sinkerly abandoned by him. Let me help you with the definition of abandonment- we'll go to Webster on this, only goes back to 1828- "left without NEEDED protection care or support" and "left by the owner" and "left to fall into a state of disuse" and "no longer held or thought of; given up". In ref to your comment about my IP background- try again, I am a veteran IP
infringement investor with 17 years with IDCC and VHC more recently- you have nothing I havent seen before. You keep coming back, and so do I, Pal.