InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

I_Am_Ram

05/02/17 3:41 PM

#160240 RE: learningtoinvest #160235

It's a legal document showing what SFOR is willing to let other people sell or use their patents for. Of course it doesn't cover some of them, but they can't get more than 100% of what the infringing companies benefited from possibly infringing on them. It's not a situation where the judge goes all your revenues for the next 10 years go to SFOR. They sit down and access damages. I'd expect numbers similar to the MSFT suit if they do settle. Maybe a little more. But not by a factor of 10 or 100
icon url

Hate Liars

05/02/17 3:44 PM

#160243 RE: learningtoinvest #160235

They are completely different patents. Ram, I think your overall assessment is reasonable (I could be overstating the valuation but I think that 500 million+ is possible) with the exception that Ropes and Gray will most certainly provide data on SFOR's market value lost due to the infringers based on the OOBA/MFA patent, which is the one that scares the infringers the most.
icon url

B RY

05/02/17 3:50 PM

#160248 RE: learningtoinvest #160235

Exactly! Infringing revenues made due to patents use. ;^)