InvestorsHub Logo

plutoniumimplosion

05/01/17 4:27 PM

#37497 RE: TASBES0101 #37492

If Cowan had a huge problem the case would have been over with a long time ago. The case would have been quietly settled. This case.... how can TAUG show extraordinary damages? Also, suing a company with professional liability insurance is never a good idea because the liability carrier has the knowledge of all similar cases in the past.

About a year ago the case had a little potential. Then came the puppets, the ex-parte letters to the judge from a 3rd party with no standing, the complaints to the state board of accounting from the Plaintiff's side by a 3rd party, so no standing or whistle blower protection. A whistle blower from the Cowan side would have held a little water.

I'd love to be a fly in the courtroom when Cowan is asked about that!

Seth, you'll already be there.