Replies to post #101869 on Trans-Pacific Aerospace Company Inc. (fka TPAC)

[THall]

A Reverse Merger with SI is a death blow to TPAC holders. Apparently no research was done on how a reverse merger works. Holders will be offered a buyout price. SI has manipulated the price down to make all shares worthless.

If you are an original shareholder in a failed company that is planning to go through a reverse merger, you will have a chance to vote on whether to accept the merger. Since your stock is essentially worthless, voting for the reverse merger might seem to present hope of eventually recovering your investment. You will receive a certain number of shares in the new company in exchange for your original shares, but that number will be considerably smaller than the number of shares in your original holding. For example, the new company may trade 25 percent ownership for the public shell. If the new company has 100 million shares authorized, it gives 25 million to the original company's shareholders. If the original company had 250 million shares issued, each shareholder will receive one share of the new company in exchange for 10 original shares. In this example, if you owned 1,000 shares of the original stock, you would receive a certificate for 100 shares of the new stock.

[Trumpcard]

IF in fact a RM is happening!

Why would SI want TPAC to show any revenue?

My hunch is all SLA's and contracts were written to funnel through SI and not TPAC...therefore TPAC wouldnt be hiding revenue.

Once TPAC is merged into SI TPAC will have plenty of revenue.

Lastly, once TPAC is fully merged into SI and taken off the OTC...Then revenue can be transferred to TPAC and share structure can be reduced to the target of 700m. Once all that is completed in the restructuring then SI PAC can relist TPAC offering on the NASDQ!

Everything was laid out in the restucturing timeline and plenty of additional breadcrumbs were dropped pointing to this.

MRVB's were always owned and operated by SI so until SI releases it to TPAC it never had to be reported as revenue.