InvestorsHub Logo

jantinna

09/03/06 3:55 PM

#62746 RE: eelfland #62745

Good post.

PinkZombie

09/03/06 4:06 PM

#62748 RE: eelfland #62745

The DIFX may also "waive, modify, or not require compliance with the Listing Rules either generally or to suit the circumstances of a particular case". Page 6, point 1.8. So, we may be further along than we know. Remains to be seen, but we could have a green light already. IMO


http://www.difx.ae/listing/listing/download_listing_rules.html

ATM

09/03/06 4:14 PM

#62752 RE: eelfland #62745

eelfland,

How can you make such a bold emphatic statement like that

re: I know Steve said there were shares allocated for that purpose, but he misspoke, just as anybody here who thinks any more reverse mergers will occur is just wrong

What would make you so bold as to say that Steve Sulja misspoke?
Have you discussed this with him? And if not, who are you to say what his intentions were other than what he himself plainly articulated?

jk21

09/03/06 4:19 PM

#62755 RE: eelfland #62745

eef: i don't think sljb will reverse merge into another company. i'm thinking some other foreign private company will reverse merge into sljb. someone said with patriot act stuff that accomplishing that would be very difficult.