Replies to post #114126 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[rige]

Again, those restrictions are in relation to CIP IP.
No restrictions on Eon IP which lqmt has free use of with the only restriction being territorial markets.

I'm tired of trying to explain it.

[gorgol]

Post number 114127 is concise and should be a satisfactory answer to your question.

As I said before, no one knows what's going to come of the APPLE agreement with Li on board.

Could you please let this angle of concern drop?

[joshuaeyu]

Let's stop this Judge Judy episode.

If we all can accept the fact that there is no plan and or capacity for LQMT to participate in high volume CE mfr business, it will make this argument pointless.

Li has stated time after time that CE business is too big of an elephant for Eontec (never mind LQMT) to monopolize. This is why all these plan of JV to establish the ECO system.

Things can change "down the road" naturally include MTA amendment and cross license agreement change. They are all intertwined.

As I pointed out to you in the past (which you recognized and agreed), non-CE disclosure within the cross license agreement was done "purposely" to protect Eontec formula from being absorbed by the CIP.