Replies to post #114030 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[vanwes1]

Read my post. The question was about revenues derived for liquidmetal from Apple based off of the current MTA that cannot happen. Yes Li's formulation can be used in the CE space. Most of the companies that are using it are Chinese companies which Li has licensing rights to through Enotec. Liquid metal can make money that way because they could derive revenues from what Mr. Li makes off royalties in China. I said a long time ago that liquid metal Hong Kong and liquid metal USA will merge at some point and become one company. They basically are at this point it's just a formality of signing papers to make it official. But to my first point CIP is off-limits and you and I both know it

[BBboy]

Excellent points rige.

Li is going to make liquidmetal a billion dollar enterprise. I think Apple will negotiate and come along for the ride.

I have already switched over to samsung since my last iphone.

My next phone will be made from bmg, whether Apples or anothers.

[PatentGuy1]

Apple didn't buy the rights to Li's cheaper BMG formula,
and Li can use his BMG formula in CE so long as CIP is not used,
and Li can market BMG formula as Liquid Metal instead of Liquidmetal.

Yes, Li can do a lot of things because he is the major share holder in LQMT and Eontec. I, on the other hand, only own shares of LQMT, and consequently, I am concerned with what LQMT can do.

LQMT doesn't have a license to use Eontec's formula's in the field of CE. If Eontec manufactures CE products how does that put money in LQMT's (and my) pockets?