InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

biosectinvestor

04/17/17 1:46 PM

#113340 RE: learningcurve2020 #113338

My posting was the opposite. If he knew there were something wrong, he had a fiduciary duty, long ago to sell, and he hasn't, which is suprising, given the stock's trajectory.

So I wouldn't otherwise disagree.

However, I promised to consider Doc Logic's post. Haven't done so yet, so I reserve my judgment. It's amusing that your post responds to my post, suggesting that I have said anything contradictory to my previous postings.

However, your post still doesn't deal with the reality that he still holds the stock. It left the NASDAQ, it's an OTC, and it is 22.7 cents, with dilution potentially ahead yet. He has a fiduciary duty to limit the loss of his investors capital, every single day. It's quite curious that he restated his confidence in the technology, not that long ago, and continues to hold, when, given that he is a regulated money manager, would seemingly, if he had lost confidence, be under a duty to preserve his investor's capital. Very strange to me. The logic of the shorts is strange, and I'll admit, generally speaking, I've not found the logic of many on these points to be all that convincing, other than those facts I just indicated.
icon url

biosectinvestor

04/17/17 1:51 PM

#113342 RE: learningcurve2020 #113338

However, who said the company is going bankrupt? That's also nonsense. That's not to say it cannot happen. Any microcap biotech can go bankrupt at any time. But your speculation is neither here nor there.