InvestorsHub Logo

Myth

04/10/17 1:58 PM

#101399 RE: MoneyMan #101396

That's one way to look at it......another would be to look at how many days before Red Oak it traded below .002.....yes, picking .0015 would make my point not as valid.

Anyone can look at historical prices and see plainly between the time time the Tonaquint lawsuit and Red Oak coming in shows NUMEROUS opportunity for an easy double, or better.

Even CCEL was flipping it....

So we don't have to use .0015 and .005 at all......

My point is simple, as with any stock there were ample opportunities to trade the stock.......and as history shows time and time again buying and holding a dilution pig like this over the years was very costly to some.

imo nothing " drastic " has to happen...lol....just going to take a bit more time.

No worries.....