InvestorsHub Logo

Protector

04/03/17 12:05 PM

#293461 RE: biopharm #293441

biopharm, I have a more generic opinion on that rather then just HG/BMY.

I follow PPHM and the findings just confirmed at AACR that there is an "IN GENERAL" problem with the treatment of "cold tumours".

PS is a BIG BREAK because it has been EVOLVED as a break to serve during apoptosis (natural cell death) to avoid the immune system would mistake dying cells (and there damage and debris) for damaged cells due to an anomaly. If the immune system would do that we would continuously have fevers, headache, etc as the immune system would want us to rest/not consume any energy and use it all itself to produce immune cells and attack
the dying cell.

SO I can understand that in patients with hot tumors, where there is already some immune reaction and T-Cell infiltration, the anti-PD-1 for instance (and other anti-IO's) might function because YOU NEED T-CELL in order to bind to their PD-1 receptor so you can PREVENT the T-Cell from binding with PD-L1 (which would disable the T-Cell from attacking the cell).

But in COLD tumors you do not have sufficient T-Cell penetration (what makes it a cold tumor) and hence the blocking of the PD-1 on the few T-cells does work on itself but the impact on the patient is neglectable because there are INSUFFICIENT T-CELL's.

Watch this melanoma related video or read the text. It explains what COLD TUMOR means in that context.

Bavituximab is a GENERAL REGULATOR (not for nothing call global/upstream or systemic check point) that keeps PS from suppressing the immune system, then stimulates the immune system and as a result is said to CONDITION THE TUMOR ENVIRONMENT.

And that means that more T-Cell infiltration will occur and hence the tumor will WARM UP so to speak. From there the anti-IO drug takes over, it binds the, say, PD-1 receptors on the new T-Cell army and so those T-cells cannot be disabled by PD-L1-PD-1 binding which means the T-Cell will take care of the dying/infected cell.

So BMY, Merck, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, etc ALL have the same problem and we know now from Dr Wolchok's lab at Memorial Sloan Kettering that CAR-T has the SAME problem.

BUT PPHM's Bavituximab works ALSO in CAR T combinations AND is NON TOXIC (which was the problem until now for OTHER agents used in CAR T).

SO I think the war is already busy and attempts are made behind the curtains to work with PPHM.

biopharm

04/15/17 5:11 PM

#294990 RE: biopharm #293441

Now, HS-110 may be a PS Targeting drug....is this possibly why Rahul stopped poppinv up at PPHM cc and also why Jeff Hutchins left and lands over at Heat Biologics... ?



Cold and Hot tumors seems to be the hot attraction theses days and "Checkmate Pharmaceuticals" also on that path...

"Checkmate Pharmaceutical’s Lead Product Candidate CMP-001, Is A CpG-A That Converts Immunologically “Cold” Tumors To Immunologically “Hot” Tumors"
http://checkmatepharma.com/technology

Reading the MOA it does not say exactly what it targets.... but says things similar to what PS Targeting does and says it makes checkpoint inhibitors work better...

I wonder how many are duplicating as much as they can....those PS Targeting traits...

biopharm

04/30/18 2:29 PM

#326475 RE: biopharm #293441

HEAT using PS Targeting IP? Hmmm

Maybe that is why Rahul ex- Peregrine covering analyst that was with Noble Financial

Now, HS-110 may be a PS Targeting drug....is this possibly why Rahul stopped poppinv up at PPHM cc and also why Jeff Hutchins left and lands over at Heat Biologics... ?

HS-110 (viagenpumatucel-L)

Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (“NSCLC”)

HS-110 utilizes ImPACT-modified lung cancer cells to stimulate a patient’s immune system to activate a cytotoxic T cell response against a range of antigens that are known to be expressed by a high proportion of patients with NSCLC. The backbone cell line for HS-110 was selected based on antigenic overlap with patient tumor specimens, including known antigens as well as many additional known and unknown antigens. This approach provides a significant advantage over single antigen approaches by reducing the risk of antigen-loss variants emerging post-treatment and by addressing the underlying genetic and antigenic heterogeneity within tumors.

Heat Biologics is conducting two clinical trials evaluating HS-110 for the treatment of NSCLC:

A multi-arm Phase 2 trial using HS-110 in combination with Bristol-Myers Squibb’s anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor, nivolumab (Opdivo®). For more information reference study protocol NCT02439450 on clinicaltrials.gov.
A Phase 2 randomized, controlled trial using HS-110 in combination with cyclophosphamide. For more information reference study protocol NCT02117024 on clinicaltrials.gov.

http://www.heatbio.com/pipeline/hs-110

-------------------

....and Heat Biologics would require PS Targeting if they use "cyclophosphamide"
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=130082441

....which is why I think HS-110 may be PS Targeting