Replies to post #99033 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[ohsaycanyousee82]

No, but the expectation of data was certainly understandable especially given the original slot and title ahead of the conference. Now the speculation as to why it changed.

[ExtremelyBullishZig]

There was an abstract with a 15-month positive results title that was to be presented. It was pulled. We read it a couple months ago when a poster provided a link to the abstract.

[attilathehunt]

They did announce by the fact of the abstract. They had to know it would become public. It does every time so it's not any different this time. If they intended not to then they shouldn't have raised expectations they would. That is my primary issue. Since they posted the abstract they needed to follow thru for consistency purposes. By pulling it, it leaves the reasons why "all over the place". Was it bad, was it too good to be true, deal/partnership related or perhaps they thought it would be ready and it wasn't. I believe they it would have been better to show what you have and say it was preliminary 15 month data. I tend to lean towards it wasn't as good as they hoped. Until such time it is released, NO ONE really knows why and every' guess is just as good as another.