InvestorsHub Logo

VeronicaFox

03/31/17 1:17 AM

#36942 RE: Kallie #36941

Third parties almost always pay for the promotions, but somehow the third parties received the shares that they're so desperate to dump. Those had to be issued by SHOM, plus they even refer to their "trading business" in the 10-K, "Demand for our business will be dependent on, among other things, market acceptance of our trading business."

Miguel Dotres is on the top of the list, he was the previous CEO and both websites are still registered in his name.

Are you aware of the Coke fiasco? That determined they are not above fabricating falsehoods. That's why I tend not to believe much of what's in their otc disclosures, plus none of it is vetted for accuracy.

I'm still puzzled that SHOM needs nonstop P&Ds and an additional +332 million shares over a few months period while they supposedly have a large LOC. Makes no sense.

There is also the homemedy.com website that was to be operational this quarter, not a word about what happened or if there's a delay. Also OTCMarkets was to be brought current long ago, yet SHOM still remains limited-info with a "yield sign".




DJ Ponder

03/31/17 10:14 AM

#36946 RE: Kallie #36941

Roflmao , this is CALLED the OTC.
TIME TO LOWER EXPECTATIONS A WEE BIT MORE.

DJ Ponder

03/31/17 10:47 AM

#36949 RE: Kallie #36941

Otc Companies cant use stock to pay for IR lmao.
So these scams simply pay for it another way. Lololol
Remember these are POS SCAMS. B
They are little more than hastily scribbled business plans with a ticker symbol attatched.
So anyway these schlock promoters that rarelyb if ever disclose , are paid by a third party.
The third party can be a simple noteholder carrying some bs debt that took deeply discounted stock as payment.
Scumbags have many avenues available from which their illicit money raising activities can be accomplished.
Regulators are largely MIA when it comes to these piles of crap, and fraudsters know it and take advantage of it.



DJ Ponder

04/01/17 5:11 PM

#36961 RE: Kallie #36941

What "filing" did you look at?
Did you notice the latest otcmarkets reports WERE SUBMITTED OUT OF SEQUENCE?



Curious as to how that happened?
Maybe as to why ?