InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Wangenstein

03/29/17 10:30 AM

#56622 RE: Spider Web #56618

BOLD SUBJECT TEXT MAKES ME FEEL IMPORTANT

Amazing that RXMD is the only company in the world that isn't affected by seasonality, and how lucky we are to have you here to identify it for us. That said, I'm not sure you've "proven" much of anything here (anything you'd like, anyway).

Tell you what, why don't you go find quarterly RXMD script counts and revenues for 2016, and show me that Q1 = Q2 = Q3 = Q4. That way, I'll know that annualizing part of Q1 2017 makes sense as an estimate for all of 2017. Otherwise, your 'analysis' only works to show how great RXMD will do in 2017 as they head into their busy season.

I'll wait.
icon url

Spider Web

03/29/17 1:50 PM

#56631 RE: Spider Web #56618

That Type Of Analysis Would Not Be Fair

Edited

If last year's averages are combined into
this years averages, for data comparisons ,
it would then make any current Growth-Rate
look even . . . W O R S E .

It is fortunate that I kept both years separate.

This Should Have Been Worth The Wait