I get that and I appreciate a lot of the digging you've done, but If we truly see Keough as competition, I think we need to dig a little deeper into him. You've referenced otikos prior charges which he was eventually deemed not guilty (still concerning, I agree), but is Keough really a saint? From what I understand he placed his name as an inventor on technology that he clearly had no role in developing or clinically testing, he was barred from practicing patent law for a year, and has had some sort of dispute resulting in bad blood between him and the inventor of the product he is trying to sell!
I'm going to start researching their company a bit more and see what I find, but I appreciate the discussion.