InvestorsHub Logo

wellitmaybeton

03/17/17 11:17 AM

#1968 RE: wirelessman77 #1966

Once again. You'd think that, but also take a look at the relationship between the unsecured and other players. Possibly criminal, we'll see. Exactly how you feel is what concerns you should express. The FCC asks for those leaving comments to adress ALL issues on your initial objection. I'm sure ATT wants a clean & seamless transaction but unfortunately nothing has been clean or seemless given the history of some of these players, and the current scenario. Since we have no solid details on what the deal looks like for the currently IMO defrauded shareholders, this public comment period is extreemly important to express your concerns in detail with this transaction. Depending on the total purchase price to even suggest 10 to 1 ATT is still an insult. That would be less than the equivalent of what STRP is currently trading at. 1:1 is more like it and fair, but this isn't about fair, they're going to use leverage to shut you out, assuming that every one bought for a nickel, but not everyone bought at nickel prices. My point being if the "right" thing is done in this instance, and we're bought for Billion(s) +, but some $5/6 share equivalent lowball-offer was made you're still "screwed". Express your concerns & maybe you'll get some non public insight.