Replies to post #4181 on Wave Systems Corp. (fka WAVXQ)

[tampa123]

Please excuse the obvious spelling errors in my last post

T123

[2bStealthy]

tampa,

I'm not speaking for snackie on this accord. My perspective is that seeing the forest and the trees is part of what we all do. What is different is the level of committment to the vision.

Snackie is 100% committed to the vision.

Some of us are at some lesser degree committed. I freely admit that I haven't had the same level of confidence as snackman. Sometimes I wish I did. The fact is that I synthesis data differently than he does. We both agree that trusted computing will happen. Until rather recently I, like Snackman, knew that trusted computing was going to happen, but I wasn't as sure that wave would be involved.

With Intel my uncertainty about wave not being involved with trusted computing evaporated as we stumbled out of the desert.

Will we stumble again? Probably.

But I know (100%) certainty that trusted computing will happen. I'm 99.99% confident that wave will be involved with trusted computing. Compare that to just a week ago of 100% and 50%.

I allow for the .01 (99.99%) difference because wave might get bought before it can be a full fledged participant.

Nothing has changed but everything is different.

[michaele]

Tamp123: Snackman
I think the point is don't bash the stock just to be bashing it (there are many out there that do -- we think we know their true intent); don't bash management because they are not doing something you think they should be doing (we don't know what their doing -- no one knew Intel was putting us on the motherboard -- what else do we not know); don't rehash the same point (even its fact) over and over and over again.

And finally, yes this is the Wave Board, populated with people who believe in Wave and have many many scars to prove it. If its too rosey on this board then they should find another board. I'm not saying its right or its wrong -- it is what it is. -- I've seen the results of an unfettered board and, quite frankly, its worthless. Could we be missing something --possibly -- I think "net net" we have way more good going on this board that will overcome if anything we might be missing.

Just an opinion -- I like it this way so I choose to stay.