InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Jestiron

03/12/17 3:02 PM

#473792 RE: phinhead1972 #473778

Changing your argument. Mine is that the billing suggests a LOT of assets/services by A&M. You were suggesting there are no assets that could justify those 'fantasies'.

So, do you the concede that A&M is working with assets large enough to satisfy the theories you are trying to refute? To be clear...im not asking you to state that these assets are coming back to escrow or WMI, in part or in their entirety.

Jest
icon url

hotmeat

03/12/17 6:08 PM

#473807 RE: phinhead1972 #473778

They've been billing approximately $2 million/yr since the beginning,...for what services???

Better yet, why don't you try proving they're not.