Changing your argument. Mine is that the billing suggests a LOT of assets/services by A&M. You were suggesting there are no assets that could justify those 'fantasies'.
So, do you the concede that A&M is working with assets large enough to satisfy the theories you are trying to refute? To be clear...im not asking you to state that these assets are coming back to escrow or WMI, in part or in their entirety.