Replies to post #68165 on Solaris Power Cells Inc (fka SPCL)

[Fasstcat]

Wow. The picture gets prettier. Awesome find. Thank you!!

[INSTATRADER]

Great find there...

For all the people reading this:

The company has FRONT and BACK revenue streams.... You only need a HANDFUL of subscribers on avg (like 2 or 3!) per obscure title as the numbers get real high real fast... and common sense says publishers are doing this because there IS a market for this, and after 8 years they are coming back month after month to publish!

Like any business there will be titles more popular than others, and the premium titles likely have hundred(s) of subscribers monthly each...

All on RECURRING billing cycles!

$$ any way you look at it here...

Where's the large expenses? The publisher already designs and delivers the title... all PIXEL needs is a few engineers to keep the site functioning properly and updated, as well as a salesforce, mgmt, advertising, and office space...

This looks to be a cash cow business that needs nothing more than some good advertising to grow.

Not only that... but an INVESTMENT BANK is running the show here... think they won't be looking for M&A when we hit the capital markets?

THINK BIG

[hobowilly]

The article is two years old?

[kingpindg]

So it's $180 per month per title...


That means Fasstcat's math was right, but he was using a bad factor.

Unfortunately, the 10,000+ magazines means issues available, not titles (e.g., if I have 3 Sports Illustrated magazines on my coffee table, I have 3 issues of one title). From their blog linked below, as of January 2016, they said they worked with 900 different magazine titles.

So, if all 900 titles were published to the minimum 3 newsstands for 12 months, $180 x 900 x 12 = $1.944M / year. If all 900 were published to all 8 newsstands for 12 months, $480 x 900 x 12 = $5.184M /year.


http://blog.pixelmags.com/



.