InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DeerBalls

03/12/17 3:50 PM

#39001 RE: GTCar #38999

GT, thank you for your great information, as always!!!

Still find it funny/lame, the fixation on the transactional history of VPLM...? Like thousands of developmental/pre-revenue companies (think tiny drug development companies), VPLM uses stock as currency. THEY HAVE NO REVENUE!!! In turn, they trade small portions of the company to survive and pay for services needed. Would anyone expect someone coming to VPLM and saying, "Hey, we like what you're doing, we want to work for you for free"???

Each individual needs to judge whether this is an issue for them or not. IT IS NOT AN ISSUE FOR ME! VPLM's source of funding is very common and not unique at all.

VPLM hasn't been an "instant gratification" situation up to this point; I believe we are nearing a point when it will be.
icon url

VVVVVV

03/12/17 4:46 PM

#39003 RE: GTCar #38999

Well, that "time" is a long way from now. 2018!

Can anyone explain how you can sell the company when there's a discrepancy on the outstanding shares. How exactly is that going to work? Therefore, for argument sake, if the company has an offer for $ 2 billion, with let's say, using round numbers of 1 billion outstanding shares, equaling $ 2.00 a share. How does the 100 million shares, factor in?

Let's see if anyone has an answer for that one?

Unfortunately, this is the leverage Kipping has going for him. IMHO