InvestorsHub Logo

akika

03/09/17 7:39 PM

#6623 RE: grantastic #6622

so basically no hope?

TopFemaleExec-2014

03/19/17 9:18 PM

#6660 RE: grantastic #6622

Has anybody ever seen a legal document proving that "MaxD Patent" is owned by Max Sound? I haven't seen it. I can tell you that the statement is not true: "all hardware and all software of video compression infringes". It is absurd.

Back to the contract, have any of you seen the VLL-Max Sound ownership transfer? I don't think there's ownership of a patent. I don't know what the trigger mechanism is, but you should all ask to see it, seeing as how this is a public, SEC regulated corporation. And entity that is required to be transparent. Not with secrets they don't have to be shown, but if an Intellectual Property is what you're all believing, then you need to see if the name of Max Sound Corporation is assigned ownership in a particular Vedanti Systems Limited and/or Vedanti Licensing Limited bundle of 22 patents.

Neither of the Vedanti firms has ownership of the software. My company has owned that and licensed it to Vedanti Systems Limited but it's not yet licensed formally to Vedanti Licensing Limited. It can be but isn't yet. I also licensed my coding and software in 2009, and 2013 to a couple of different entities. But not to Max Sound. I offered 2016 to help the whole process of settling for Netflix and Google interests.

I do not know if Vedanti licensing is taking place. It seems that it is stalled for all the reasons I would not allow Max Sound to have my patents, could not have a License, and never had one: if you have 1 patent and you sue Google as Greg Halpern did (and secretly)you end up with NO PATENTS; what you have is a crippled non-commercialized-moribund bundle of assets: why? DEFENSE IS NULLIFY, INVALIDATION, APPEALS COURT -for years and years. And if you win? Maybe there's a license silver lining. But, look at Mark Cuban's deal. That is where my hard-fought-hard-won, costly patents and assets are now for Vedanti: in Max Sound generated PTAB USPTO appeals court, and in Munich Federal Patents Court: nullification.

Go online and read Duncan Powell Vedanti partner's webpage of Vedanti Licensing Limited. You'll get straight answers there. Sellers wouldn't have signed a terms sale if we weren't convinced of their business acumen, deal making strength, and if they didn't have the top firm in the US representing them.

Constance Nash
Top Female Exec 2014

TopFemaleExec-2014

04/14/17 12:58 AM

#6797 RE: grantastic #6622

Guys, why do you refer to Rurouni as Greg Halpern? Yes he is, but how do you know it? As for the IPR and Nullity, both of which I received after Greg Halpern sued illegally with both my USA patent a major tent pole, and with my German patent, another major tent pole suing Google illegally in Delaware, 2014 August 9, when he and his lawyers unlawfully, illegally and against their State Bar licenses too: used my '339 USPTO patents and inventions, boasted all over the Internet that 'max sound had worldwide exclusive (ownership 100%) License'.

And then sometimes, MaxD'd pitch on iHub and Yahoo, and MarketWired, and elsewhere that Max Sound had "worldwide License of patents" he renamed to odd "ODT", then he forged contracts using my signature from a valid Trade Secrets & Post Its Notes May 16, 2014 -first and correct -but not a License Contract either; a simple Trade Secrets & Post Its JV litigation: he did not do. He did Vedanti Systems Limited -as plaintiff: ILLEGAL. In time it will catch up. A valid no Patent Infringement contract: no license of anything, reduced our stock from 30M down to 10M "you didn't give us a License he writes first, and down from cash of $3MM cash to $500k for due diligence for us to show lawyers our source code and original post its notes (we never got back in their loaning to Greg for lawyers we didn't know we didn't have), plus he owned $1MM cash. He never paid it. He stole the 10MM shares via O'Leary and Globex and themselves Max Sound October 18, 2014. Why? He wanted my signature on the illegal San Jose case of October 1 2014. With TGO4 LLC and Vedanti Licensing in a deal with max Sound, they believe they've solved that situation of Forgery and No License Contract. They believe that Google will settle.

Google walked on the Attia's last week, why will they settle here?
Netflix didn't settle and you were all wound up like clocks for December 8, 2016 in my own case that I cared deeply about: Munich Germany: both Netflix and Google had been sued by Max Sound. Then they were sued by newco Vedanti Licensing. Then somehow they decided at VLL to hook up with Max Sound and to enjoin both cases. But why? Max Sound was kicked out by Steve Hawkins in Germany in December 2015 in Mannheim.


Greg hid valid contract: it had NO LICENSE OF VEDANTI, IT HAD NO LICENSE OF BABY-VSL COMMUNICATIONS WHICH OWNED ZIP --and that is what Eric Beuther said -and knew from hour one -when his partner Chris Joe wrote August 1, 5 2014: "VSL Communications doesn't own patent, Vedanti does, and Vedanti doesn't have an agreement with Max Sound". --then they fildo you see IPR- PTAB in USP, NO PATENTINFRINGEMNENT, from SEC and us too, and ed Patent Infringement in the name of Vedanti Systems as plaintiff: 5 strikes against them all. Would it make money? August 9, 2014? October 1, 2014 San Jose? December 2014 Mannheim, Germany?

Look at 2017 April 13: IPR in USPTO, started August 9, 2014.
Look at 2017 April 13: Nullification in Germany: started Dec 2014. And German patent courts are fastest in the world. Stolen when? May 15, 2014. Paid May 16, 2014. I didn't sign Patent Infringement agreement. I signed Trade Secrets with my Post Its Notes. You really would have made a great deal of stock profit. I would't have lost my 14 years and millions, and lost 2 patents, the sole German and sole US patent to what? How could we sell our assets? We couldn't. Will Google settle? I say no. I always said no. They have too many patents to settle; they indemnify zillions of vendors: they can't afford to settle. I know how to win,but VLL won't do it. I would if I bought the company back.

TGO4 aka VLL,filed June 2016: Fraud Upon The Court with those Greg, Paul Myers forgeries, declarations under penalty of perjury: Vedanti Hawkins/Dave here/Wheeler/Powell --they all, after having ownership less for 2.5 months -- filed against Max Sound for Forgery -true forgery and a crime --in San Jose.

So they can't say that I bring it up: I didn't even file Fraud Upon The Court: they did. That it was my idea to do it is true: I told my lawyers, nobody cares about Forgery of my signature being used on a forgery of a phony Vedanti [Max Sound back-dated to May 19, 2014) contract. But astoundingly it was not a License Contract of any kind. And definitely no rights to Vedanti valuable patents I owned with my Vedanti Systems Limited, UK. Dave here, as well as TGO4 LLC, and Vedanti Licensing Limited, did not LICENCE PATENTS TO MAX SOUND. And they did not give Max Sound ownership YET EITHER. Why not? Maybe Google or Netflix or both won't settle? Then what?

And so far, they haven't signed a contract giving ownership of patents either. It was Google in the Appeals court January 19, 2017 that told us they had a copy of the Vedanti Licensing Limited & Max Sound Contract "partnership", "it isn't signed" says Google.

Max Sound's March 31 2017 10K also states that Max Sound does not own patents by saying "partnership contract isn't signed".

So why go there with those stories? Your stock can profit from it's normal cycles: if it's half a cent and you buy a boatload, it'll go up to 1 cent or more; so it goes up to 1.5 cents, you make a big profit when you sell, and start over. You're in the stock gambling business, not in my patents and inventions and settlements business. Prior to me you were in the Liquid Spin business. And prior to that you were in the 'phenomenal' audio business, name got changed to Max Sound, owned at the time by old-timer Lloyd Trammel "Surround Sound" chap. Who is now sued by Max Sound.

And yet your stock survives. Greg is good at this job. I've said that many times: he makes sure over the last 20 years with Mike Spatz Chicago PR whiz, with Blaisure CEO of Max Sound, and with Paul Myers SEC Compliance, and with loans such as Harvey Vechery's $4M last October -May that he keeps your stock buzzing along.
ps: I was not paid $100M or more. I was paid $1M. With a tough contract which was a JV formation. If I don't get my terms taken care of, you'll be talking about me owning it again.

Haven't you figured out that your stock goes in cycles; long before I was ever the subject matter in iHub or Yahoo. You don't need pumping. The price was low when Hawkins filed against Max Sound in Mannheim Germany via Bardehle Law, Munich for the Google -max Sound case. I didn't file it, Hawkins of VLL filed it:12/06/15.Max Sound officially anyway, had no standing. No License Contract ever. Do they have standing now? I don't know.


Constance Nash
Top Female Executive