There's no requirement to show SFOR as provider of the technology. They may not be. That's not how this works. It's licensing. When Pizza Hut uses a prominent song but a different singer, the original songwriter gets a payment. It's called licensing.
Really? DBM$ to da moon, then you come to this board and ba$h. SFOR has more potential than most pennies (it may go nowhere). The otc is a huge risk no matter what equity we play. But to show up to push the price down is what makes the otc a cesspool. I, as do most here, know the past of SFOR and it wasn't pretty. But when most who show up here on occasion to do harm and don't care to do their DD should learn to have a little respect. Every investor has their reason for risking money on the equity of their choice. Thank for pointing out what most of us already know. All of coarse my opinion!