Replies to post #2749 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[bag8ger]

Chig,

I drove my car 20 miles to get it serviced today and while I drove my thoughts bordered on language which wanted to say what you've said so much better than I could have.

Novicetx's comment about a newsletter not coming out until after the ink was dry hit home, and I began to regret my having emailed DNA Phenomics (in the reply to their acknowledgment of my having registered for their email updates)asking if they were related.

Your suggestion DNA Phenomics replaces a 9-11 tainted ( my characterization) DNAPro without US ownership obvious makes sense, as does your message of our practicing caution before we leap to conclusions which may or may not be true or may or may not be harmful to the company's plans.

[Teamlasvegas]

Well Said chig, Ggreat Post.
Done Deal.
Later,The Team.

[twelks]

chig...Your point of caution is well taken. There is the power of truth in what you say. Premature disclosure can sometimes cause problems for sure. It probably pays to take the patient road and let things develop. This is not meant to take anything away from the diligent efforts of those who dig for information about the company. After all we are driven to learn and it must feel good to those who successfully dig up these tidbits of new information.

Good Day
Gary

[cowboyd]

Chig

I think your sentiments are well spoken and very valid. The interesting aspect of the world today is the accessibility of information to a much greater degree than ever before. I agree with the idea that investors should not interrupt any portion of the business process. However, companies must take accountability for leaving such tantalizing traces lying around for the finding.

I would hope the efforts of an enthusiastic investor could not squash a pending deal. These slips should be more in line with messages telling the associated companies that a higher degree of professionalism is needed.

The information ferrets should be commended for their efforts and while I am very conservative by nature I can not advocate suppression of those finds if the researcher feels inclined to share.

In the final analysis this is just another aspect of the information age that companies and investors will have to deal with.

JMHO and worth what you paid for it.

cowboyd

[ustacud]

Chig, I don't have much to say here, but:

We're Americans with an genetic dispostion to 'shoot from the hip'. No other people have done what we've done and if we are a bit hasty then so be it. When someones shooting at ya you kinda got to not spend a lot of time making the decision on whether to shoot back or not. You might end up dead.

We've all got bucks invested here and some of these guys are 'REALLY' good at what they do. When they see something that might affect their position they act on it. And, when they find info like we've seen over the past few hours they let the other pilgrams know about it. Kinda like circlin the wagons, so to speak.

Anyway, good luck to ya. We're all in this together and I'm really glad we've got the quality of folks here that we do. I'll watch their back, and yours, anytime.

Dick

[SlopsterSlasher]

chig,Carrie and tony has many times in the past asked those on the RB board to restrain them selves, Please. I agree with your post and could have not said it better. Thanks Again.

[worktoplay]

chig...

As always well thought out advice. And since it was I that posted the original link to the site, I would like to take just a moment to explain my thought process.

The link to the July 28, 2003 DNA Phenomics PR was actually passed along to me by a friend who found it but didn't have time to examine it. From his preliminary look at the PR, he thought there may be a connection, but he was on his way out and wouldn't get another chance to look at it until later in the week. He passed it along to me and told me to "Do with it what you will."

In considering whether to post it I considered the following:

1) The website is public domain as are the PR's issued by DNA Phenomics. Granted they didn't mention DNAP by name, but I recognized DNAP's science once I read the "Resources" page.

2) While looking at the Management of the company, I noted that the COO's bio contains the following text, "Working closely with his partners in the U.S., Ezehan assembled an experienced team of business leaders, scientists, and investors to quickly bring DNA Phenomics into existence." From this I concluded that, a) his partnership appeared to have been established, as in past tense, and b) the Malaysians didn't seem concerned with it being public knowledge that they were working with U.S. companies.

3) That left DNAP and their reason for privacy. Rightly or wrongly, I concluded that their reason probably has more to do with the SEC than it does with their desire that this be kept quiet. They may not be ABLE to say anything, but that wouldn't preclude some saavy investors from taking a closer look.

What the members of this board did with the original post is truly amazing. I will reiterate that this is really an all star class of invest(igat)ors...lol The fact that this came on the heels of the Senecio discovery, and that the two ended up connected is extraordinary.

I concur with the thought that we should exercise caution, and shouldn't interfere in the company's dealings. I would certainly not post anything that I thought was out of bounds, and would encourage all investors to judge their actions and the potential ramifications very carefully before acting.

At the same time, I would point out that if a group of amateurs hanging out on a stock board came up with this information, then it is likely that other entities that are seriously interested in DNAP's business dealings know this already.

Heck, look at how much more secure that site is already, once we alerted them that their backside was a bit exposed...lol

Good advice for all. Thanks.

Later,
W2P

[Gcbr]

Chig---I was part of the digging crew last night so I
guess part of this is aimed at me. All I did was dig and
report what I found to Doc T. I will leave it to the BOSS
man to decide what should be done and how to do it. What we uncovered last night was some sloppy website work . Any
15 year old kid could have done it. Now if there was a spy
they would have been much better at what we did. That was not
fancy footwork last night. Good detective work---nothing more.

Some one also said that the pages had been updated today. There
is a dirty little secret there too. The site has an auto
updater on it. In the early days of the net we could see how
serious business were about their website---all you had to do
was see how long it had been since they updated it. Now it
looks like they do it every day---they dont.

I spend at least 2 hours a day on the computer looking for
stuff for DNAP. If I find something I send it to Doc T---and
let him decide what should be done with it. I send him one
or two cold cases a day when I am here. No I dont get paid
I am just being a good stock owner. There are ways to help
besides sending money.

I am not going to stop digging. I will tell you all what I
find if it relates to us. I will tell Doc T if it relates
to his work. I do not feel I am responsible for what happens
to the information after I find it. I promise all of you
I dont have any secret method for finding info on the net.

Take Care
Arch
PS No hard feelings.