To All:
The work done here by many of you is impressive and many of us "others" owe great thanks.
I would like at this point to throw in a little bit of precautionary
conjecture.
Since the capabilities of a few here can take us to the very last link with the most revealing of tidbits, there may with that come a little responsibility to discretely process the information without causing a problem of sorts for the company.
Although the recent Malaysian insight and the quick erasure of DNAP footprint was not a big deal, let's just take a look at it from the company end. Reasons for changing DNAPro's name and not exposing the latest Malaysian progress:
1. As mentioned, the ink isn't dry,so..
2. Competition, or entities not wanting to see such advances could use power to delay. But as yet not considered:
3. Better to come off as a Malaysian company in Asia than as an American corporation, especially at this time, and with a conference coming up there. Being discreet in this emerging market will allow greater progress, and different countries where the power structure is more tenable than ours, we could waste great progress with a single mess up. Enough of that.
This is just an example of what we may come across, and it is a given that the company will not be able to hide every facet of it's corporate/ scientific advances.
It is my modest proposal that upon new revelations, we stop short of e-mailing the company and other involved entities until pragmatic discussion shows this as a positive move. Excitement sometimes leads to hasty action, and I only think it wise to contemplate repercussional probabilities first.
Not trying to make laws here, and I am probably way out of line but"just want to be the best we can be".
After all, we are shareholders: it's our company.
Sorry if I'm preaching. Great work, guys!
