InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

flipper44

02/10/17 2:58 PM

#101754 RE: christjamin #101752

No, we only hope they can communicate publicly regarding major issues we are concerned about -- even if that means clarifying answers they already gave.
icon url

BWIS

02/10/17 3:54 PM

#101762 RE: christjamin #101752

I've noticed and does concern me that some of the "long timers" and "longs" who seem to have nothing but more optimism and more rope to provide nwbo management over the last 24 months seem to have all of a sudden become impatient and needy with regards to details.

You guys want the management team to tell you every small bit if detail do you gus make sure, certain....cmom, like every biotech, the management will provide you with data/info they deem relevant to investor

icon url

Doktornolittle

02/10/17 6:52 PM

#101809 RE: christjamin #101752

"every small bit if detail" The significance of the screening hold is not a small detail. The company presented the FDA lifting the hold as a change in heart by the FDA. The broader investment community did not buy it.

It's a very big deal. If the FDA really did have a change of heart, that would be an enormous boost to confidence in the stock, just as it was perceived as an enormous negative when the hold was imposed.

However, it is very possible that the removal of the hold was as significant as the company would like us to believe, but because it is a reflection of the FDA's estimate, perhaps from a distance, of efficacy, it is a topic they choose not to attempt to address at this critical time in the trial. Maybe they don't want to walk that line. That is how us longs have rationalized much of the long silence, so it is just one more thing to rationalize. I would agree with that.

But that this is just a trivial detail... no.