Replies to post #36861 on Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[ksviking12]

Why discuss how the stock trades in damages caused to a company by an auditing firm? One has nothing to do with the other. If you want to talk about shareholders suing Cowan and then make those arguments you may have some sort of connection to make. However, damages to a company are not measured in terms of the way the stock trades. Damages to a company that has no product are non-existent. If you wan to argue that Cowan should pay for the fees and costs to bring the company back to current status, that would also seem valid. But let's stop this charade about how there are huge damages for TAUG when TAUG had nothing to be damaged.

[diannedawn]

Hmmm....

I believe strongly that the fact that since the trading volume increased approx. 8 fold (on average since December 6 2016), it shows the type of collateral damage caused by Cowan's inexcusable conduct

What a difference since tauriga became current again. It's a shame that tauriga got delisted in july 2015 because of Cowan Gunteski because it clearly changed everything

Trading manipulation going on?
It happens all the time down here in pinkyland...
I sure hope there isn't any proof...

ROTFLMAO