InvestorsHub Logo

oneragman

02/06/17 2:58 PM

#99642 RE: chas1232123 #99641

Chas,

"I expect it to take less time than the 60% IA because before they had to do all the check-ups"

Are you not expecting them to do another round of check-up's? I would think they would want updates.

rafunrafun

02/06/17 3:25 PM

#99644 RE: chas1232123 #99641

C- for simplicity and consistency, I am only talking about onets, and not when the actual events occur...

They announced 60% onset on March 31, 2016. Youu think it will take 12 months to announce the 80% onset? Keep in mind, they said 100% onset will occur in 2017... so that would be 12 months for 60-80% but < 9 months for 80-100%? Why such big difference?


Whalatane

02/06/17 3:47 PM

#99647 RE: chas1232123 #99641

RE ", by which I mean RRR between about 18% and 58% "

Wide enough goal for you .? .....:-)

Kiwi.

HDGabor

02/06/17 3:53 PM

#99649 RE: chas1232123 #99641

c-

Thx, I will include you in the next update as:
- chas1232123: stop / Mar 31 / May 20 / 38%

I (more or less) agree with everything said by you, except that the announcement will take more time now than at 1st IA. I do not rule it out since, they made the announcement (at 1st IA) when enough events were adjudicated AND in the adjudication process ... they could choose different method and announce 2nd IA process after enough adjudicated events.

Best,
G

isaeed

02/07/17 9:32 AM

#99684 RE: chas1232123 #99641

That timing sounds almost exactly like my prediction except for the RRR. The only thing I am worried a little about is the high dose statin skewing the RRR and placebo