Replies to post #133417 on Zerify Inc (ZRFY)

[Gold49er]

Thanks brooklyn, Blank Rome would not have taken on the cases on a contingency basis if it did not have the plans in the first place to see it all the way through Jury Trial, if the infingers actually were take it that far.

The British Phrase "In for a Penny in for a Pound " comes to mind.

Hope all is well in Brooklyn with you and yours.
Glad to hear that they talked they guy down from the Brooklyn Bridge. And that the Boy Scouts were out at Coney Island having fun on the Beach and not indoors playing video games.

Hope you ordered enough Chicken Wings from Buffalo Boss down on Jay Street to last though Half Time.

Enjoy the Super Bowl,
49'er

[absintheminded90210]

SCHEDULING ORDER
"2. By November 23, 2016, Plaintiff shall, in accordance with L. Pat. R. 3.1, 3.2, and 3.5, provide its asserted claims and infringement contentions and accompanying disclosures. 3. By January 17, 2017, Defendants shall, in accordance with L. Pat. R. 3.6(c), (d), (e) and (f), serve both its Non-Infringement Contentions and Responses and Invalidity Contentions, as well as claim charts, and produce associated documents."

Haven't seen any non infringement or invalidity contentions despite being listed in the original answers. No claim charts that I've seen.

None of these guys are going to trial, Never mind claim construction. Not gonna drag out. IMO