["This sort of demonstrates my point: we were hearing the exact same thing about Clipstream II a few years ago. You remember, "sooner rather than later", "weeks not months" were all said in the context of debugging and rigorous testing of it, back in the day."]
Yes, I remember that, but there is no law that says this time it has to be the same. The previous version (with their own codec) ran into real-world problems, most notably frame rate stability and IPS throttling.
I think they've solved these problems with HVEC, only to encounter higher CPU usage. But what I have seen from the latest demo's, that is being addressed, with a new iteration coming up.
Guarantees? No, I've said that all along, but I'm encouraged to see that they did manage to offload to the GPU substantially, at least that's what I noticed.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
