I found those patterns of treatment response quite enlightening in a familiar way. 1. Conventional treatment response, 2. increase followed by tumor shrinkage, 3. stabilization for long periods of time or 4. no response.
When you include immunology reports and the like, you're not kidding that there is a lot of "moving parts" that constantly "evolve."
I always say, we must be smarter than the disease, and to me, kicking the can down the road is not working. Research in this field must think more on its feet. Many of the researchers in those videos seem to think the same thing.
Another thing that caught my ear: "We are specifically treating the immune system, not the tumor"