InvestorsHub Logo

Surwin

01/26/17 12:09 PM

#16029 RE: gello3859 #16028

License agreements were signed in 2005, 2006, and 2010, and all had cash coming in, yet not one of those past license agreements were taken into revenue and the one from 2005 had to be reverse because the party did not pay. So what is the difference from the past? Why do we still have two license agreements from the past on the books and no revenue recognition, as well as why haven't those agreements been monetized?

I see very little difference from the past only more suspect with deals like Ganthet and only development stage companies.

gello3859

01/26/17 12:11 PM

#16031 RE: gello3859 #16028

Fooling - not filling

BigBaboon

01/26/17 10:33 PM

#16048 RE: gello3859 #16028

Well played gello3859... VLDI is on the pinksheets... but is no penny stock... and Bruce does continue to jump the hurdles... and make progress... IMHO... VLDI is well positioned at present... and those rewards ... that those frustrated shareholders (as you put it)... have been waiting for... are getting closer at hand... with each passing day... 4 to 5 more deals... and cash flow positive... who knows... maybe those 4 to 5 deals... are already on his desk... in the process of being ironed out...??? or maybe already done...??? where ever they are... I got a feeling it won't be all that far down the road...