It sure as Hell doesn't exist. You have access to the filings...find the Agreement and post it if it exists. Even the person you're posting that BS to knows that it doesn't exist....he told me as much....
Really LOL....I think it exists just like I thought that Cowan was notified in the fall of 2014 from the inspection and just like I told you there was enough time between the time Cowan was notified of the independence violation and that the PCAOB gives enough time before a judgement is out for the public company to correct the issues. Provided of course, the auditor follows the rules of multiple agencies that oversee them.
In this case Cowan didn't. I guess Cowan could act like bigger fools ib Court and try to say they did not know that an investigation by the agency overseeing them didn't know that the violation was no curable even though their own worksheets proved the case. But then again, there is this rule that accountants need to be aware of, that is something like buyer beware. Only it is accountants beware.
All the $1000.00 a day does is put money in a financial firms pocket and increase the payout by the insurance company
people need to lower their expectations.
No, they do not! But they certainly can raise them from irresponsible expectations like this lawsuit will not fly and TAUG is padding the bill. Or how about TAUG is a shell.
And I think enough disinformation has been exposed in the last week that people get it.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
