There's no sense in meeting to request answers to questions. You do that before deciding to meet.
If there's sufficient interest, and the Articles permit it, shareholders should consider what changes they'd like to implement and have it voted on at an Extraordinary Shareholders meeting. There'd have to be sufficient votes to achieve quorum.
Management is supposed to run the company and generate good returns on the investments made. Its up to the trading market to generate and sustain ongoing liquidity for the tradeable float. There's a disconnect between the two groups.
To digress:
My observation over time is that UCPA Management have generated sustained and increasing revenues in the tens of millions of dollar range, but the operation is still marginal from an investment perspective.
OTC traders at various points in time have tried to generate interest, but their vision is too short-sighted and too limited to allow UCPA to flourish as a liquid ticker. That's a shame since the Company doesn't dilute like so many tickers do.
Question for a ESM:
- What would you like to see as outcomes?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
