Tuesday, January 17, 2017 2:02:59 PM
If there's sufficient interest, and the Articles permit it, shareholders should consider what changes they'd like to implement and have it voted on at an Extraordinary Shareholders meeting. There'd have to be sufficient votes to achieve quorum.
Management is supposed to run the company and generate good returns on the investments made. Its up to the trading market to generate and sustain ongoing liquidity for the tradeable float. There's a disconnect between the two groups.
To digress:
My observation over time is that UCPA Management have generated sustained and increasing revenues in the tens of millions of dollar range, but the operation is still marginal from an investment perspective.
OTC traders at various points in time have tried to generate interest, but their vision is too short-sighted and too limited to allow UCPA to flourish as a liquid ticker. That's a shame since the Company doesn't dilute like so many tickers do.
Question for a ESM:
- What would you like to see as outcomes?
The paradox of iHub: buy high, sell low
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM
ILUS Provides a First Quarter Filing Update • ILUS • May 16, 2024 11:26 AM